ycriticismthesubjectivityverr
susobjectivityorcriticasartistorscie
tistdebatehasspecialsig
ifica
ceforherthequr
estio
is
oto
lyacademicbutpoliticalaswella
dherdefi
itio
willprovokespecialrr
iskswhicheversideoftheissueitfavorsIfshedefi
esfemi
istcriticismasobjectivea
r
dscie
tificavalidverifiablei
tellectualmethodthata
yo
ewhetherma
orwoma
cr
a
performthedefi
itio
oto
lymakesthecriticasartistapproachimpossiblebutmayr
alsohi
deraccomplishme
toftheutilitaria
politicalobjectivesofthosewhoseektochr
a
getheacademicestablishme
ta
ditsthi
ki
gespeciallyaboutsexrolesIfshedefi
esr
femi
istcriticismascreativea
di
tuitiveprivilegedasartthe
herworkbecomesvul
r
erabletotheprejudicesofstereotypicideasaboutthewaysi
whichwome
thi
ka
dwr
illbedismissedbymuchoftheacademicestablishme
tBecauseoftheseprejudiceswor
me
whousea
i
tuitiveapproachi
theircriticismmayfi
dthemselveschargedwithi
r
fr
abilitytobea
alyticaltobeobjectiveortothi
kcriticallyWhereasme
maybefreetr
oclaimtheroleofcriticasartistwome
ru
differe
tprofessio
alriskswhe
theychoosr
ei
tuitio
a
dprivateexperie
ceascriticalmethoda
ddefe
ser
Thesequestio
sarepoliticali
these
sethatthedebateoverthemwilli
evitablyber
lessa
exploratio
ofabstractmattersi
aspiritofdisi
terestedi
quirytha
a
academir
cpowerstrugglei
whichthecareersa
dprofessio
alfortu
esofma
ywome
scholarsr
o
ly
owe
teri
gtheacademicprofessio
i
substa
tial
umberswillbeatstakea
dr
withthemthecha
cesforadisti
ctiveco
tributio
tohuma
isticu
dersta
di
gaco
tribr
utio
thatmightbea
importa
ti
flue
ceagai
stsexismi
oursocietyr
Aslo
gastheacademicestablishme
tco
ti
uestoregardobjectivea
alysisas“masr
culi
e”a
da
i
tuitiveapproachas“femi
i
e”thetheoreticia
muststeeradelicatephilr
osophicalcoursebetwee
thetwoIfshewishestoco
structatheoryoffemi
istcriticismr
shewouldbewelladvisedtoplaceitwithi
theframeworkofage
eraltheoryofthecr
riticalprocessthatis
eitherpurelyobjective
orpurelyi
tuitiveHertheoryisthe
morer
likelytobecompareda
dco
trastedwithothertheoriesofcriticismwithsomedegreeor
fdispassio
atedista
ce418wordsr
31Whichofthefollowi
gtitlesbestsummarizestheco
te
tofthetextr
AHowTheoriesofLiteraryCriticismCa
BestBeUsedr
BProblemsCo
fro
ti
gWome
WhoAreFemi
istLiteraryCriticsr
CAHistoricalOverviewofFemi
istLiteraryCriticismr
DLiteraryCriticismArtorScie
cer
32Accordi
gtotheauthorthedebatehasspecialsig
ifica
ceforthewoma
whoir
satheoreticia
offemi
istliterarycriticismbecauser
Awome
whoareliterarycriticsfaceprofessio
alrisksdiffere
tfromthoser