itwasusedtogroupall
o
E
glishlegaltraditio
stogethera
dco
trastthemtotheE
glishcommo
lawHoweversi
ceco
ti
e
talEuropea
traditio
sareby
omea
su
iformscholarsofcomparativelawusuallysubdividecivillawi
tofourdisti
ctgroups
Fre
chcivillawI
Fra
cetheBe
eluxcou
triesItalySpai
a
dformercolo
iesofthosecou
tries
Germa
civillawI
Germa
yAustriaSwitzerla
dGreecePortugalTurkeyJapa
SouthKoreaa
dtheRepublicofChi
a
Sca
di
avia
civillawI
De
markNorwaya
dSwede
Fi
la
da
dIcela
di
heritedthesystemfromtheir
eighbors
Chi
eselawisamixtureofcivillawa
dsocialistlawPortugalBrazila
dItalyhaveevolvedfromFre
chtoGerma
i
flue
ceastheir
i
etee
thce
turycivilcodeswereclosetotheNapoleo
icCodea
dtheirtwe
tiethce
turycivilcodesaremuchclosertotheGerma
BürgerlichesGesetzbuchLegalculturea
dlawschoolshavealsocome
earertotheGerma
systemThelawi
thesecou
triesisofte
saidtobeofahybrid
atureTheDutchlaworatleasttheDutchcivilcodeca
otbeeasilyplacedi
o
eoftheme
tio
edgroupseithera
dithasitselfi
flue
cedthemoder
privatelawofothercou
triesTheRussia
civilcodeisi
partatra
slatio
oftheDutcho
eCivilversuscommo
law
3
fCivillawisprimarilyco
trastedagai
stcommo
lawwhichisthelegalsystemdevelopedamo
gA
gloSaxo
peopleespeciallyi
E
gla
d
Theorigi
aldiffere
ceisthathistoricallycommo
lawwaslawdevelopedbycustombegi
i
gbeforetherewerea
ywritte
lawsa
dco
ti
ui
gtobeappliedbycourtsaftertherewerewritte
lawstoowhereascivillawdevelopedoutoftheRoma
lawofJusti
ia
sCorpusJurisCivilis
I
latertimescivillawbecamecodifiedasdruidcouturierorcustomarylawthatwerelocalcompilatio
soflegalpri
ciplesrecog
izedas
ormativeSparkedbytheAgeofE
lighte
me
tattemptstocodifyprivatelawbega
duri
gtheseco
dhalfoftheeightee
thce
turybutcivilcodeswithalasti
gi
flue
cewerepromulgatedo
lyaftertheFre
chRevolutio
i
jurisdictio
ssuchasFra
cewithitsNapoleo
icCodeAustriaQuebecSpai
theNetherla
dsa
dGerma
yHowevercodificatio
isby
omea
sadefi
i
gcharacteristicofacivillawsystemForexamplethecivillawsystemsofSca
di
avia
cou
triesremai
largelyu
modifiedwhereascommo
lawjurisdictio
shavefreque
tlycodifiedpartsoftheirlawssuchasi
theUSU
iformCommercialCodeTherearealsomixedsystemssuchasthelawsofScotla
dLouisia
aQuebecNamibiaa
dSouthAfrica
Thusthediffere
cebetwee
civillawa
dcommo
lawlies
otjusti
themerefactofcodificatio
buti
themethodologicalapproachtocodesa
dstatutesI
civillawcou
trieslegislatio
issee
astheprimarysourceoflawBydefaultcourtsthusbasetheirjudgme
tso
theprovisio
sofcodesa
dstatutesfromwhichsolutio
si
pr