这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。因此：有时间一味反驳还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。Reviewerscomme
tsReviewer3：Whilerevisi
gthescriptitistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyi
dicatetheaimscopeofthestudya
dwhilemaki
gco
clusio
itistobeme
tio
edhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposesI
additio
thefollowi
garethefewsuggestio
scomme
ts，whichmaybei
cludedwhilerevisio
1。I
troductio
partfirstparalastli
eauthormustavoidtowriteambiguousstateme
tie，muchworkisstillahead，mayi
dicateproperly
2。Authorcould
otdemo
stratethereaso
why，toselecttheorga
iccompou
d
f完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全
suchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy3。Experime
talpart：Itisdifficulttou
dersta
dthei
situRAIRSexperime
ts
withhomemadeliquidsolidRAIRScellMoredetailedi
formatio
maybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworki
gi
theareaPhotographoftheassembledcellmaybei
cluded。
4Thedescriptio
give
fortheexperime
talsetup（page4）ca
beprese
tedbyflowdiagrami
stead，asa
easetou
dersta
dthesetup。
5ReslutsPart（Page6：