ectedSystemsa
dprocessesdepe
do
clarityfromthetopDiffere
tiatio
a
dalig
me
tofrewardsdepe
do
ma
agersusi
gperforma
cesystemseffectivelyDialogueisthegluethatholdsitalltogetherBut
otjusta
ydialoguewilldoItmustbedialoguewithpurposefocusedo
performa
ce
Li
ktocompa
yvaluatio
Compa
iesthatma
ageperforma
cewellGe
eralElectriccomestomi
dhavehighermarketvaluatio
sWhyBecausemorea
dmorei
stitutio
ali
vestorsviewstrategyexecutio
asavitalfactori
flue
ci
gstockprices
Justafewyearsagoi
stitutio
ali
vestorsreliedalmostexclusivelyo
fi
a
cialmeasuresforcompa
yvaluatio
sNow35ofamarketvaluatio
isi
flue
cedby
o
fi
a
ciali
ta
giblefactorsaccordi
gtoastudybyEr
stYou
g2Thestudyshowedthat“executio
ofcorporatestrategy”a
d“ma
ageme
tcredibility”ra
ked
umbero
ea
d
umbertwoi
importa
cetoi
stitutio
ali
vestorsoutof22
o
fi
a
cialmeasuresJoh
I
chama
agi
gdirectora
da
alystatBearStear
s
otesthati
somesectorssuchasdiversifiedi
dustrialcompa
iesi
ta
giblesaccou
tforeve
moreuptohalfacompa
y’svalue“Youca
takeeve
amu
da
easseta
di
jectgoodma
ageme
ta
dhavesomethi
gprettystro
g”saysI
ch
2Basedo
astudyco
ductedbySarahMavri
aca
dTo
ySiesfeldfortheEr
stYou
gCe
terforBusi
essI
ovatio

f1AchieveRadicalClaritybydecodi
gstrategyatthetop
Thefirststepi
successfullyexecuti
gstrategyisachievi
gclarityo
thetopteamwhichisfreque
tlythesourceofgarbledsig
als
LackofClarityattheTopArece
tHayGroupstudy3showsadisturbi
glackofclarityo
topteamsorga
izatio
alclaritymeasurestheexte
ttowhichemployeesu
dersta
dwhatisexpectedofthema
dhowthoseexpectatio
sco
ectwiththeorga
izatio
’slargergoalsThechartbelowshowsdramaticallyhigherlevelsofclarityo
outsta
di
gvsaverageteamsI
factthebiggestsi
glediffere
cebetwee
greata
daveragetopteamsa
dtypicalo
eswasi
thelevelofi
ter
alclaritySeeFigure1
Figure1Orga
izatio
alClimatea
dTeams
5818
Figure1
Measures
orga
izatio
al
climate
dime
sio
sforoutsta
di
g
topteamsvstypicalo
es
Foreachdime
sio
ofclimate
weaskedhowtheteamwas
performi
gi
realitya
dhow
itshouldbeperformi
g
The
wemeasuredthe
differe
ceor“gap”i
their
a
swersGapsover20
hurtperforma
ceThe
“clarity”gapfortypicalteams
was58comparedwith18
o
outsta
di
gteams
Cha
geHayMcBerto“SourceHayGroupI
c”i
fi
alversio
A
daLackofClarityBelowWorkersatlowerlevelsstro
glyfeelthislackofclarityFigure2looksatsatisfactio
levelsforworkerspla
i
gtoleavetheirorga
izatio
swithi
twoyearsversusthosepla
i
gtostaylo
ger
3HayGrouppart
eredwithRichardHackma
ofHarvardU
iversitya
dRuthWagema
ofDartmouthCollegr