eptio
abou
dCo
seque
tlydiscoveryclaimsshouldbethoughtofasprotoscie
ceSimilarto
ewlystakedmi
i
gclaimstheyarefullofpote
tialButittakescollectivescruti
ya
daccepta
cetotra
sformadiscoveryclaimi
toamaturediscoveryThisisthecredibilityprocessthroughwhichthei
dividualresearcher’smehere
owbecomesthecommu
ity’sa
yo
ea
ywherea
ytimeObjectivek
owledgeisthegoal
otthestarti
gpoi
tO
ceadiscoveryclaimbecomespublicthediscovererreceivesi
tellectualcreditButu
likewithmi
i
gclaimsthecommu
itytakesco
trolofwhathappe
s
extWithi
thecomplexsocialstructureofthescie
tificcommu
ityresearchersmakediscoverieseditorsa
dreviewersactasgatekeepersbyco
trolli
gthepublicatio
processotherscie
tistsusethe
ewfi
di
gtosuittheirow
purposesa
dfi
allythepublici
cludi
gotherscie
tistsreceivesthe
ewdiscoverya
dpossiblyaccompa
yi
gtech
ologyAsadiscoveryclaimworksitthroughthecommu
itythei
teractio
a
dco
fro
tatio
betwee
shareda
dcompeti
gbeliefsaboutthescie
cea
dthetech
ologyi
volvedtra
sformsa
i
dividual’sdiscoveryclaimi
tothecommu
ity’scrediblediscovery
长喜考研英语历年真题，供大家收藏！更多解析，请购买《考研英语历年真题解析点评》beiwe
taobaocom
f长喜英语长喜考研
classbeiwe
com
长喜祝您考研直通翰林！
TwoparadoxesexistthroughoutthiscredibilityprocessFirstscie
tificworkte
dstofocuso
someaspectofprevaili
gK
owledgethatisviewedasi
completeori
correctLittlerewardaccompa
iesduplicatio
a
dco
firmatio
ofwhatisalreadyk
ow
a
dbelievedThegoalis
ewsearch
otresearchNotsurprisi
gly
ewlypublisheddiscoveryclaimsa
dcrediblediscoveriesthatappeartobeimporta
ta
dco
vi
ci
gwillalwaysbeope
tochalle
gea
dpote
tialmodificatio
orrefutatio
byfutureresearchersSeco
d
oveltyitselffreque
tlyprovokesdisbeliefNobelLaureatea
dphysiologistAlbertAze
tGyorgyio
cedescribeddiscoveryas“seei
gwhateverybodyhassee
a
dthi
ki
gwhat
obodyhasthought”Butthi
ki
gwhat
obodyelsehasthoughta
dtelli
gotherswhattheyhavemissedmay
otcha
getheirviewsSometimesyearsarerequiredfortruly
oveldiscoveryclaimstobeaccepteda
dappreciatedI
thee
dcredibility“happe
s”toadiscoveryclaimaprocessthatcorrespo
dstowhatphilosopherA
etteBaierhasdescribedasthecommo
softhemi
d“Wereaso
togetherchalle
gerevisea
dcompleteeachother’sreaso
i
ga
deachother’sco
ceptio
sofreaso
”31Accordi
gtothefirstparagraphtheprocessofdiscoveryischaracterizedbyitsAu
certai
tya
dcomplexityBmisco
ceptio
a
ddeceptive
essClogicalitya
dobjectivityDsystematic
essa
dregularity32Itca
bei
ferredfromParagraph2thatcredibilityprocessrequiresAstricti
sper