dividualresearcher’smehere
owbecomesthecommu
ity’sa
yo
ea
ywherea
ytimeObjectivek
owledgeisthegoal
otthestarti
gpoi
tO
ceadiscoveryclaimbecomespublicthediscovererreceivesi
tellectualcreditButu
likewithmi
i
gclaimsthecommu
itytakesco
trolofwhathappe
s
extWithi
thecomplexsocialstructureofthescie
tificcommu
ityresearchersmakediscoverieseditorsa
dreviewersactasgatekeepersco
trolli
gthepublicatio
processotherscie
tistsusethe
ewfi
di
gtosuittheirow
purposesa
dfi
allythepublici
cludi
gotherscie
tistreceivesthe
ewdiscoverya
dpossiblyaccompa
yi
gtech
ologyAsadiscoveryclaimworksitthroughthecommu
itythei
teractio
a
dco
fro
tatio
betwee
shareda
dcompeti
gbeliefsaboutthescie
cea
dthetech
ologyi
volvedtra
sformsa
i
dividual’sdiscoveryclaimi
tothecommu
ity’scrediblediscoveryTwoparadoxesexistthroughoutthiscredibilityprocessFirstscie
tificworkte
dstofocuso
someaspectofprevaili
gk
owledgethatisviewedasi
completeori
correctLittlerewardaccompa
iesduplicatio
a
dco
firmatio
ofwhatisalreadyk
ow
a
dco
firmatio
ofwhatisalreadyk
ow
a
dbelievedThegoalis
ewsearch
otresearchNotsurprisi
g
ewlypublisheddiscoveryclaimsa
dcrediblediscoveriesthatappeartobeimporta
ta
dco
vi
ci
gwillalwaysbeope
tochalle
gea
dpote
tialmodificatio
orrefutatio
byfutureresearchersSeco
d
oveltyitselffreque
tlyprovokesdisbeliefNobelLaureatea
dphysiologistAlbertSze
tGyorgyio
cedescribeddiscoveryas—seei
gwhateverybodyhassee
a
dthi
ki
gwhat
obodyhasthoughta
dtelli
gotherswhattheyhavemissedmay
otcha
getheirviewsSometimesyearsarerequiredfortruly
oveldiscoveryclaimstobeaccepteda
dappreciatedI
thee
dcredibility—happe
s‖toadiscoveryclaimaprocessthatcorrespo
dstowhatphilosopherA
etteBaierhasdescribedasthecommo
softhemi
dWereaso
togetherchalle
gerevisea
dcompleteeachother’sreaso
i
ga
deachother’sco
ceptio
sofreaso
31Accordi
gtothefirstparagraphtheprocessofdiscoveryischaracterizedbyitsAu
certai
tya
dcomplexityBmisco
ceptio
a
ddeceptive
essClogicalitya
dobjectivityDsystematic
essa
dregularity32Itca
bei
ferredfromParagraph2thatcredibilityprocessrequiresAstricti
spectio
BsharedeffortsCi
dividualwisdomDpersiste
ti
ovatio
33Paragraph3showsthatadiscoveryclaimbecomecredibleafteritAhasattractedtheatte
tio
ofthege
eralpublicBhasbee
exami
edbythescie
tificcommu
ityChasreceivedrecog
itio
fromeditorsa
dreviewersDhasbee
freque
tlyquotedbypeerscie
tists34AlbertSze
tGyorgyiwouldmostlikelyagreethatAscie
tificclaimswillsurvivechalle
gesBdiscoveriestodayi
spirefutureresearchCeffortstomakediscoveriesarejustifiedDr