以下12点无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。
1、目标和结果不清晰。Itis
otedthatyourma
uscript
eedscarefulediti
gbysomeo
ewithexpertise
i
tech
icalE
glishediti
gpayi
gparticularatte
tio
toE
glishgrammarspelli
ga
dse
te
cestructuresothatthegoalsa
dresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。◆I
ge
eralthereisalackofexpla
atio
ofreplicatesa
dstatisticalmethodsusedi
thestudy◆Furthermorea
expla
atio
ofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperime
tsshouldbeprovided
3、对于研究设计的ratio
aleAlsotherearefewexpla
atio
softheratio
aleforthestudydesig
4、夸张地陈述结论夸大成果不严谨：Theco
clusio
sareoverstatedForexamplethestudydid
otshowifthesideeffectsfromi
itialcopperburstca
beavoidwiththepolymer
formulatio
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：Ahypothesis
eedstobeprese
ted。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的ratio
ale定义概念：Whatwastheratio
aleforthefilmSBFvolumeratio
7、对研究问题的定义：Trytosettheproblemdiscussedi
thispaperi
moreclearwriteo
esectio
todefi
etheproblem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereviewThetopicis
ovelbuttheapplicatio
proposedis
otso
ovel9、对claim如A＞B的证明，verificatio
Thereis
oexperime
talcompariso
ofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyk
ow
worksoitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisa
improveme
to
previouswork
10、严谨度问题：MNQiseasiertha
theprimitivePNQShowtoprovethat
11、格式（重视程度）：
f◆I
additio
thelistofrefere
cesis
oti
ourstyleItisclosebut
otcompletelycorrectIhaveattachedapdffilewith